Time tracking is an essential practice both for regulatory compliance and for safeguarding labor rights. However, it can lead to a perverse dynamic if interpreted under the premise that "the more hours, the better." This mentality fuels presenteeism, where mere physical presence is valued above effective contribution. The key to overcoming this challenge lies in clearly separating the objective data of hours worked from the subjective evaluation of results, thus laying the foundations for an organizational culture that values both aspects in a balanced way.